Billions Spent, But Where’s the ROI? The Brutal Truth About AI in Healthcare.
Billions are being spent. Promises are sky-high. But is AI in healthcare actually delivering? Let’s unpack the messy truth. Numbers, failures, wins, and what it really takes to get ROI right.
Handoff #11 (Insider Edition) | Reading time: 10 minutes
The healthcare executive stared at the AI vendor's PowerPoint, beaming with a “400% ROI” claim.
She wasn’t impressed.
Three failed AI projects in two years had taught her a hard lesson: flashy projections don’t pay the bills. Each promised transformation. Each delivered frustration.
She’s not alone.
Across hospitals, clinics, and decision rooms everywhere, there’s a growing tension.
AI vendors trumpet promises of revolutionary returns.
Hospital corridors quietly tell stories of disappointment.
You’ve seen the headlines, “AI saves lives,” “AI slashes costs,” “AI solves burnout.”
But here’s the truth behind the marketing: 70–80% of healthcare AI projects fail.
Up to 87% never even reach production.
And yet, spending is accelerating. The healthcare AI market is set to grow almost 40% every year through 2030.
Why? Because when AI does work, it works spectacularly.
But getting there? That’s where reality bites.
This is your no-spin, behind-the-curtain look at the real ROI of AI in healthcare. Where it delivers, where it collapses, and what it actually takes to win.
Whether you’re a nurse handed a new AI tool, a clinician evaluating its worth, or a leader placing million-dollar bets, this is the clarity you’ve been waiting for.
Let’s get into it.
What Happens After the PowerPoint Ends
The pitches are irresistible:
“AI will save healthcare $150 billion annually by 2026.”
“Reduce physician burnout by 70%.”
“Implementation in weeks, not months.”
Who wouldn’t want all that? But here’s the inconvenient truth:
The gap between promise and reality isn’t just wide. It’s a chasm.
As Dr. Deepti Pandita, CMIO of UCI Health, put it plainly:
"AI cannot solve for broken systems or broken workflows."
She’s seen it firsthand. AI only amplifies what already exists.
Good systems? AI can make them great.
Broken systems? AI makes them more expensively broken.
Part of the problem is the way ROI is calculated. Traditional spreadsheets can’t capture the full picture:
What’s the dollar value of reduced cognitive load for clinicians?
How do you account for the hidden cost of workflow disruptions?
What’s the true timeline for adoption?
Dr. Pandita makes a key distinction:
Soft ROI: Clinician satisfaction, reduced burnout, improved documentation quality.
Hard ROI: Actual dollars saved, revenue gained.
And here’s the catch, the hard ROI usually follows the soft ROI, but it takes time. More time than most vendors will ever tell you.
"That hard ROI will come," Dr. Pandita says, "but it's not there today. Having that conversation and presenting it in that manner is very important."
This is why so many feel burned. They were sold instant returns, but got delayed value, even when the tech works.
Receipts, Not Promises: AI That Delivered
Despite the messiness, there are success stories. Let’s look at where AI is genuinely delivering hard ROI.
Radiology: The 791% ROI Win
Radiology has quietly become one of AI’s strongest proving grounds.
A 2024 study in the Journal of the American College of Radiology reported:
451% ROI over 5 years with AI platform Calantic by Bayer.
Factoring in radiologist time savings? 791% ROI.
The hospital invested $1.78M over five years and saw revenues of $3.56M.
Time saved:
15 full workdays of waiting time eliminated.
78 days cut from triage.
10 days from reading.
41 days from reporting.
But here’s the kicker: the biggest win wasn’t time, it was downstream revenue.
AI flagged patients needing follow-ups, scans, and treatments, creating significant additional income.
However, same tool, different setting: standalone diagnostic centers saw ROI plummet to $0.41 for every $1 invested.
Context is everything.
Nuance DAX: 80% ROI and Burnout Relief
Physicians spend nearly 2 hours on paperwork for every 1 hour with patients.
A real-world standout? Nuance’s Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX).
At University of Michigan Health-West:
80% ROI
Providers saw 12 more patients/month.
Work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) rose by 20/month.
Clinicians using DAX Copilot over 60% of the time reported significantly lower exhaustion.
Besides productivity, it was about giving clinicians back their time. No more after-hours charting, no more burnout spiral.
Revenue Cycle Management: Millions in First-Year Returns
OSF HealthCare deployed an AI assistant, Clare:
$2.4M ROI in just one year.
$1.2M contact center cost avoidance.
$1.2M new patient net revenue.
Endeavor Health’s AI assistant, Eleanor:
3x ROI in the first year.
$740K patient capture revenue.
$300K contact center cost avoidance.
Lyell McEwin Hospital used AI for discharge predictions:
6.5% reduction in hospital stays.
2.1% drop in readmissions.
Projected annual savings: nearly $10 million.
Yes! the wins are real.
But they’re not automatic. What separates winners from wasted investments? Read on.
The Hidden Costs Vendors Hope You’ll Ignore
For every success story, there are dozens of quiet failures. Here’s why.
⚙️ Workflow Integration Woes
Dr. Pandita nails it again:
"If the AI tool doesn't seamlessly integrate into the workflow, it's going to meet resistance and it's going to fail."
Successful AI feels "almost invisible."
If it adds steps, forces workarounds, or disrupts clinicians' flow, you’ve already lost.
🧩 The Data Quality Disaster
Here’s the brutal stat: 87% of AI projects never reach production.
Why? Bad data.
IBM Watson Health’s cancer AI stumbled not because of bad algorithms, but messy, inconsistent data from hospitals.
Poor data leads to:
Missed trends.
Bad predictions.
Trust erosion.
Operational headaches.
Scalability nightmares.
Data issues cost U.S. businesses $3.1 trillion annually.
💸 Financial Blindspots
License fees are just the beginning. The real costs?
Integration.
Workflow redesign.
Continuous training.
Data cleaning.
Maintenance.
Infrastructure upgrades.
"There are a lot of hidden costs of AI," Dr. Pandita warns. "They can turn positive ROI projections into financial drains."
🧑⚕️ Adoption (or Lack Thereof)
The most accurate AI tool is worthless if clinicians don’t use it.
Resistance comes fast if:
It feels like extra work.
They weren’t involved in selection.
Trust isn’t built.
Vendor ROI calculators rarely factor in human behaviour. But human behaviour makes or breaks adoption, and ROI.
Flawed ROI Calculations Are Misleading Everyone
Most vendor ROI projections are fantasy math:
Assume perfect adoption.
Assume pristine data.
Assume zero workflow disruption.
In reality:
Adoption curves take 12–18 months.
Data cleaning eats 60–70% of project timelines.
Workflow disruptions hurt short-term productivity.
Even accurate algorithms don’t guarantee value:
False positives add work.
Complex interfaces kill efficiency.
Distrust kills adoption.
Dr. Pandita is clear:
"The tool must be measured by real-world impact, not just theoretical savings."
Shifting the Equation: How To Actually Win with AI ROI
The difference between a case study and a cautionary tale.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Healthcare AI Handoff to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.